nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 01, v.42 15-24
粉煤灰制备地聚物复合材料低速冲击下力学性能
基金项目(Foundation): 国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFC3800903); 江苏省基础研究计划自然科学基金项目(BK20231430)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19944/j.eptep.1674-8069.2026.01.002
摘要:

【目的】为提高粉煤灰的资源化利用率并降低其对环境的影响,本研究致力于将粉煤灰作为主要原料之一,制备地聚物复合材料(one-part fiber-reinforced geopolymer composites,OP-FRGC),并研究其力学性能。【方法】以粉煤灰、高炉矿渣等原材料为前驱体,分别掺入2%体积分数的聚乙烯(polyethylene,PE)、聚乙烯醇(polyvinyl alcohol,PVA)和聚丙烯(polypropylene,PP)纤维,制备试件并对不同纤维增强的OP-FRGC进行静力学性能测试、抗冲击试验和裂缝扩展分析。【结果】掺入2%体积分数PE纤维的OP-FRGC(OP-FRGC-PE)的抗压强度、极限拉伸应变和拉伸强度分别可达49.49 MPa、6.87%和6.78 MPa,高于掺入2%体积分数PVA纤维的OP-FRGC-PVA(44.56 MPa、3.57%和5.94 MPa)以及掺入2%体积分数PP纤维的OP-FRGC-PP(39.91 MPa、1.14%和4.96 MPa)。在5、10和15 J能量的单次与累积冲击试验中,OP-FRGC-PE的最大冲击力为12 477.4 N,分别是OPFRGC-PVA的1.24倍和OP-FRGC-PP的1.43倍。此外,不同冲击能量和次数下的裂缝最大宽度与分形维数的计算数据表明,OP-FRGC-PE的最大裂缝宽度和分形维数均低于OP-FRGC-PVA和OP-FRGC-PP,这证明OP-FRGC-PE具有更小的塑性变形和较低的冲击损伤。【结论】掺入PE纤维的OP-FRGC相较于PVA和PP纤维体系在静力学性能、抗冲击性能及裂缝扩展控制方面表现出显著优势,使其在对韧性、耐久性和裂缝控制要求较高的工程领域中具备较为广阔应用潜力。

Abstract:

[Objective] In order to improve the resource utilization rate of fly ash and reduce its impact on the environment, this study is devoted to using fly ash as one of the main raw materials to prepare one-part fiber-reinforced geopolymer composites(OP-FRGC) and study its mechanical properties. [Methods] Fly ash and blast furnace slag were used as precursors, with polyethylene(PE), polyvinyl alcohol(PVA), and polypropylene(PP) fibers incorporated at a 2% volume fraction. Specimens were prepared, and static mechanical tests, impact resistance evaluations, and crack propagation analyses were conducted on the fiber-reinforced OP-FRGC samples. [Results] OP-FRGC incorporating 2% volume fraction PE fibers(OP-FRGC-PE) demonstrated superior performance. It achieved a compressive strength of 49.49 MPa, an ultimate tensile strain of 6.87%, and a tensile strength of 6.78 MPa, surpassing the values obtained for OP-FRGC incorporating 2% volume fraction PVA fibers(OP-FRGC-PVA)(44.56 MPa, 3.57%, and 5.94 MPa) and OPFRGC incorporating 2% volume fraction PP fibers(OP-FRGC-PP)(39.91 MPa, 1.14%, and 4.96 MPa). In both single and repeated impact tests under energies of 5 J, 10 J, and 15 J, OP-FRGC-PE exhibited the highest maximum impact force(12,477.4 N), which was 1.24 times that of OP-FRGC-PVA and 1.43 times that of OP-FRGC-PP. Furthermore, the maximum crack width and fractal dimension calculated under different impact energies and cycles showed that OPFRGC-PE consistently exhibited lower maximum crack widths and fractal dimensions compared to OP-FRGC-PVA and OP-FRGC-PP, indicating reduced plastic deformation and lower impact damage. [Conclusion] Significant advantages are demonstrated by OP-FRGC-PE over PVA-and PP-reinforced systems in mechanical performance, impact resistance, and crack propagation control. These advantages indicate promising application prospects in engineering fields that demand high toughness, durability, and stringent crack control requirements.

参考文献

[1]SHOBEIRI V, BENNETT B, XIE T, et al. A comprehensive assessment of the global warming potential of geopolymer concrete[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 297:126669.

[2]张迪,王冬. 1993—2019年我国各省水泥工艺碳排放量统计分析[J].水泥, 2022(8):19-23.ZHANG Di, WANG Dong. Statistical analysis on carbon emissions from cement process in various provinces of China from 1993 to2019[J]. Cement, 2022(8):19-23.

[3]蒲云辉,王清远,李文渊,等.粉煤灰基地质聚合物混凝土温室气体排放量研究[J].成都大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 37(1):105-108.PU Yunhui, WANG Qingyuan, LI Wenyuan, et al. Research on greenhouse emissions of geopolymer concrete based on fly ash[J].Journal of Chengdu University(Natural Science Edition), 018, 37(1):105-108.

[4]NEUPANE K. Evaluation of environmental sustainability of onepart geopolymer binder concrete[J]. Cleaner Materials, 2022, 6:100138.

[5]张逸超,杨昊霖,吴晓鑫,等.地质聚合物混凝土力学性能、耐久性及微观结构综述[J].混凝土, 2024(11):84-87+92.ZHANG Yichao, YANG Haolin, WU Xiaoxin, et al. Review of mechanical property, durability and microstructure of geopolymer concrete[J]. Concrete, 2024(11):84-87+92.

[6]MA C, ZHAO B, GUO S L, et al. Properties and characterization of green one-part geopolymer activated by composite activators[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 220:188-199.

[7]冷玲倻,张鹏飞,梁文文.高温下玄武岩纤维增强地质聚合物混凝土的动态压缩力学行为[J].硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(3):914-921.LENG Lingye, ZHANG Pengfei, LIANG Wenwen. Dynamic compressive mechanical behavior of basalt fiber reinforced geopolymer concrete under high temperature[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2024, 43(3):914-921.

[8]GEMI D S,ŞAHINÖS, GEMI L. Experimental investigation of axial compression behavior after low velocity impact of glass fiber reinforced filament wound pipes with different diameter[J].Composite Structures, 2022, 280:114929.

[9]GANESH A C, MUTHUKANNAN M. Development of high performance sustainable optimized fiber reinforced geopolymer concrete and prediction of compressive strength[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 282:124543.

[10]王志航,白二雷,周俊鹏,等.玄武岩纤维增强地质聚合物混凝土的动态力学性能[J].振动与冲击, 2024, 43(19):134-144.WANG Zhihang, BAI Erlei, ZHOU Junpeng, et al. Effects of basalt fibers and age on dynamic mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2024, 43(19):134-144.

[11]BANTHIA N, BHUTTA A, FAROOQ M. Tensile performance of eco-friendly ductile geopolymer composites(EDGC)incorporating different micro-fibers[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2019, 103:183-192.

[12]ZHANG Z, ZHANG Q, LI V C. Multiple-scale investigations on self-healing induced mechanical property recovery of ECC[J].Cement and Concrete Composites, 2019, 103:293-302.

[13]HAN J S, CAI J M, LIN Y Z, et al. Impact resistance of engineered geopolymer composite(EGC)in cold temperatures[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 343:128150.

[14]CAI J M, PAN J L, HAN J S, et al. Low-energy impact behavior of ambient cured engineered geopolymer composites[J]. Ceramics International, 2022, 48(7):9378-9389.

[15]MIDHUN M,GUNNESWARARAO T,CHAITANYASRIKRISHNA T. Mechanical and fracture properties of glass fiber reinforced geopolymer concrete[J]. Advances in Concrete Construction,2018, 6(1):29-45.

[16]ALI R, BILAL A, EL O M H, et al. Microstructural and thermal characterization of polyethylene fiber-reinforced geopolymer composites[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 94:109904.

[17]ZHANG N, YAN C Y, LI L, et al. Assessment of fiber factor for the fracture toughness of polyethylene fiber reinforced geopolymer[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 319:126130.

[18]KARA M, ERDAG N A, KEPIR Y, et al. Low-energy repeated impact response of nanoparticle reinforced carbon fiber epoxy composite pipes[J]. Composite Structures, 2022, 299:116100.

[19]CAI J M, TAN J W, LI X P. Thermoelectric behaviors of fly ash and metakaolin based geopolymer[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 237:117757.

[20]张宗洋,沙马什布,罗琦,等.激发剂对单组分锂渣基地质聚合物流变及力学性能的影响[J].硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(7):2538-2548.ZHANG Zongyang, SHAMA Shibu, LUO Qi, et al. Effect of activator on rheological and mechanical properties of one-part lithium slag-based geopolymer[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2025, 44(7):2538-2548.

[21]SHI H, ZANG Q, WANG Y, et al. Comparative study on dynamic compressive properties and sustainability assessment of one-part fiber-reinforced geopolymer composites[J].Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2025, 22:e04503.

[22]ZHOU A, LI K X, LIU T J, et al. Recycling and optimum utilization of engineering sediment waste into low-carbon geopolymer paste for sustainable infrastructure[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 383:135549.

[23]ZHU X Y, LI W K, DU Z, et al. Recycling and utilization assessment of steel slag in metakaolin based geopolymer from steel slag by-product to green geopolymer[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 305:124654.

[24]WANG Y C, LIU F C, YU J T, et al. Effect of polyethylene fiber content on physical and mechanical properties of engineered cementitious composites[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2020, 251:118917.

[25]LEE S K, OH T G, BANTHIA N, et al. Optimization of fiber aspect ratio for 90 MPa strain-hardening geopolymer composites(SHGC)with a tensile strain capacity over 7.5%[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2023, 139:105055.

[26]HASSAN A M T, JONES S W, MAHMUD G H. Experimental test methods to determine the uniaxial tensile and compressive behaviour of ultra high performance fibre reinforced concrete(UHPFRC)[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 37:874-882.

[27]JEFFERSON A J, SIVAKUMAR M S, AROCKIARAJAN A, et al.Parameters influencing the impact response of fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite materials:A critical review[J].Composite Structures, 2019, 224:111007.

[28]ZHANG S Z, HE S, GHIASSI B, et al. Interface bonding properties of polyvinyl alcohol(PVA)fiber in alkali-activated slag/fly ash[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2023, 173:107308.

[29]REDON C, LI V C, WU C, et al. Measuring and modifying interface properties of PVA fibers in ECC matrix[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2001, 13(6):399-406.

[30]HO S, TANG W C, LI Y. Enhancing interfacial bonding between polyethylene fibers and cementitious matrices using surface modification[J]. Composites Part B:Engineering, 2021, 213:108745.

[31]FRAYYEH Q J, SWAIF A M. Mechanical properties of fly ash geopolymer compositesmortar reinforced with polypropylene fibers[J]. Journal of University of Babylon, 2017, 26(1):173-182.

[32]WU Z M, KHAYAT K H, SHI C J. How do fiber shape and matrix composition affect fiber pullout behavior and flexural properties of UHPC?[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2018, 90:193-201.

[33]褚丽晶,卓柯先,杨泽铭,等.混杂PE/PVA纤维EGC与混凝土的界面粘结性能试验研究[J].硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(2):463-473+500.CHU Lijing, ZHUO Kexian, YANG Zeming, et al. Experimental study on interfacial bonding performance between engineered geopolymer composites with hybrid PE/PVA fiber and concrete[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2025, 44(2):463-473+500.

[34]XIAO S H, LIAO S J, ZHONG G Q, et al. Dynamic properties of PVA short fiber reinforced low-calcium fly ash-slag geopolymer under an SHPB impact load[J]. Journal of Building Engineering,2021, 44:103220.

[35]SU J H, MAO J Z, ZHOU B K, et al. Dynamic compressive mechanical properties of fibre-reinforced geopolymer concrete[J].Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2025, 22:e04268.

[36]ZHONG H, ZHANG M Z. Effect of recycled tyre polymer fibre on engineering properties of sustainable strain hardening geopolymer composites[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2021, 122:104167.

[37]WEI J H, XU J J, XUE J Y, et al. Effect of replacing freshwater river-sand with seawater sea-sand on dynamic compressive mechanical properties of concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 419:135473.

[38]ZHU B R, YANG W, CHU H Y, et al. Dynamic response of ultrahigh performance engineered cementitious composites(UHPECC)under low-velocity impact:Effect of waste rubber incorporation and low temperatures[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2024, 151:105576.

[39]YE H, PAN J, ZHU B, et al. Dynamic splitting tensile properties of crumb rubber modified ultra-high performance engineered cementitious composites(UHP-ECC)[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 455:139183.

[40]MA L L, LIU F, LIU D Y, et al. Review of strain rate effects of fiber-reinforced polymer composites[J]. Polymers(Basel),2021, 13(17):2839.

[41]HAN X Y, CHEN Y, XIAO Q H, et al. Determination of concrete strength and toughness from notched 3 PB specimens of same depth but various span-depth ratios[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2021, 245:107589.

[42]仇志龙,谢全民,徐永康,等.饱水和围压条件对混凝土力学性能及分形特征的影响[J].混凝土与水泥制品, 2025(6):1-5+11.QIU Zhilong, XIE Quanmin, XU Yongkang, et al. Research effect of saturation and confining pressure on mechanical properties and fractal characteristics of concrete[J]. China Concrete and Cement Products, 2025(6):1-5+11.

[43]石俊,张翔,杨俊.基于裂缝分形的气/水压裂裂缝起裂扩展对比分析[J].非常规油气, 2024, 11(6):118-124.SHI Jun, ZHANG Xiang, YANG Jun. Comparative analysis of gas/water fracturing crack extension based on fracture fractality[J].Unconventional Oil&Gas, 2024, 11(6):118-124.

[44]李松涛,肖东,剧秀梅,等.基于分形维数的纤维混凝土孔结构与氯盐渗透关系[J].水电能源科学, 2024, 42(11):103-106.LI Songtao, XIAO Dong, JU Xiumei, et al. Relationship between pore structure and salt permeability in fiber reinforced concrete based on fractal dimension[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2024,42(11):103-106.

[45]FARHIDZADEH A, DEHGHAN-NIRI E, MOUSTAFA A, et al.Damage assessment of reinforced concrete structures using fractal analysis of residual crack patterns[J]. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics, 2013, 53(9):1607-1619.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19944/j.eptep.1674-8069.2026.01.002

中图分类号:TB332;X705

引用信息:

[1]孙剑,占先春,李兵,等.粉煤灰制备地聚物复合材料低速冲击下力学性能[J].电力科技与环保,2026,42(01):15-24.DOI:10.19944/j.eptep.1674-8069.2026.01.002.

基金信息:

国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFC3800903); 江苏省基础研究计划自然科学基金项目(BK20231430)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文