nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 04, v.42 554-561
超/亚临界机组深度调峰工况经济指标对比研究
基金项目(Foundation): 国电环境保护研究院有限公司自立项目(HBHZ2025Y01)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19944/j.eptep.1674-8069.2026.04.004
发布时间: 2026-08-15
出版时间: 2026-08-15
移动端阅读
摘要:

【目的】为进一步提高煤电机组调峰能力,以满足电力系统调峰需求,实现经济指标优化。【方法】本文选取超临界湿冷、超临界空冷、亚临界湿冷、亚临界空冷的600 MW级和300 MW级共8种类型机组为研究对象,分析了负荷率对热耗率、综合厂用电率的影响,探讨了负荷率、供电负荷、不同类型机组降负荷过程等不同条件下机组供电煤耗的变化特征。【结果】研究表明,机组热耗率和综合厂用电率随负荷率降低而升高。除超临界空冷机组和亚临界湿冷机组负荷率100%外,其他负荷率条件下4种类型机组均显示600 MW级机组供电煤耗小于300 MW级机组,超临界湿冷机组平均差值为7.55 g/(kW·h)。当机组从满负荷降至50%负荷时,供电煤耗随供电负荷减小呈缓和上升趋势,超临界湿冷机组供电煤耗增长率约7.00%;当机组负荷从50%降至30%时,供电煤耗呈剧烈上升趋势,如超临界湿冷机组供电煤耗增长率约19.76%。超临界湿冷机组在深度调峰过程节能效益较佳;若机组长时间低于300 MW运行,300 MW级机组节能优势优于600 MW级机组;若机组需频繁从满负荷向下调节负荷运行,600 MW级机组调节能优势优于300 MW级机组,均为满负荷降至200 MW时,600 MW级机组供电煤耗增长率平均为3.11%,远低于300 MW级机组的19.45%。【结论】本研究可为煤电机组制定更为合理的调度策略提供指导,降低机组在调峰过程中的能耗和排放,实现节能降耗。

Abstract:

[Objective] In order to further enhance the peak-shaving capability of coal-fired power units, so as to meet the peak-regulation demands of the power system and achieve optimization of economic indicators. [Methods] This paper selects eight types of units, namely 600 MW and 300 MW, with supercritical wet cooling, supercritical air cooling, subcritical wet cooling, and subcritical air cooling as research objects. The influence of load rate on heat consumption rate and comprehensive plant electricity consumption rate areanalyzed, and the variation characteristics of coal consumption for power supply under different conditions such as load rate, power supply load, and load reduction process of different types of units are discussed.[Results]The research results indicate that the heat consumption rate and the comprehensive plant power consumption rate increase with the decrease of load rate. Except for supercritical air-cooled units and subcritical wet cooled units, which have a slightly higher coal consumption for 600 MW units than 300 MW units at a load rate of 100%, all four types of units show a lower coal consumption for 600 MW units than 300 MW units under other load rate conditions(e.g., the average difference for supercritical wet cooling units is 7.55 g/(kW·h)). When the unit decreases from full load to a load rate of 50%, the coal consumption for power supply shows a relatively gentle upward trend(e. g., the growth rate for supercritical wet cooling units is about 7.00%). When the unit decreases from a load rate of 50% to a load rate of 30%, the coal consumption for power supply shows a more severe upward trend(e. g., the growth rate for supercritical wet cooling units is about 19.76%). Supercritical wet cooling units have better energy-saving benefits during deep peak shaving processes. For supercritical wet cooling units, if the unit operates for less than 300 MW for a long time, the energy-saving advantage of 300 MW units is better than that of 600 MW units; if the unit needs to frequently reduce load operation from full load state, the regulating energy advantage of a 600 MW unit is better than that of a 300 MW unit(e. g., when reducing 200 MW from full load, the average coal consumption growth rate for 600 MW units is 3.11%, significantly lower than the 19.45% for 300 MW units). [Conclusion]This study can provide guidance for the development of more reasonable scheduling strategies for coalfired power units, reduce energy consumption and emissions during peak shaving, and achieve energy conservation and consumption reduction in unit operation.

参考文献

[1]新华网.习近平在第七十五届联合国大会一般性辩论上的讲话(全文)[EB/OL].(2020-09-22).http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/leaders/2020-09/22/c_1126527652.htm.

[2]刘云.我国能源电力发展及火电机组灵活性改造综述[J].洁净煤技术,2023,29(增刊2):319-327.LIU Yun. Overview of energy and power system development and the flexibility retrofit of thermal power units in China[J]. Clean Coal Technology,2023,29(S2):319-327.

[3]欧阳子区,王宏帅,吕清刚,等.煤粉锅炉发电机组深度调峰技术进展[J].中国电机工程学报,2023,43(22):8772-8790.OUYANG Ziqu,WANG Hongshuai,LYU Qinggang,et al.Research progress on deep peak shaving technology of pulverized coal-fired boiler power unit[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE,2023,43(22):8772-8790.

[4]孙哲.“双碳”背景下火电厂“三改联动”现状及实施建议[J].能源与节能,2023(7):71-74.SUN Zhe. Current situation and implementation suggestions of“linkage of three reforms” in thermal power plants under background of“double carbon”[J]. Energy and Energy Conservation,2023(7):71-74.

[5]齐俊虎. 1 000 MW超超临界机组20%深度调峰控制系统灵活性改造[C]//2023年电力行业技术监督工作交流会暨专业技术论坛论文集.南宁,2023:841-851.QI Junhu. Flexibility transformation of 20%deep peak shaving control system for 1 000 MW ultra supercritical unit[C]//Proceedings of the 2023 Electric Power Industry Technical Supervision Work Exchange Conference and Professional Technical Forum. Nanning,2023:841-851.

[6]国家发展改革委.国家发展改革委国家能源局关于开展全国煤电机组改造升级的通知[EB/OL].(2021-10-29). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-11/03/content_5648562.htm.

[7]张杰.燃煤发电机组“三改联动”与异常工况检测研究[J].电气技术与经济,2024(10):196-199.ZHANG Jie. Research on‘three reforms linkage’ and abnormal working condition detection of coal-fired generating units[J].Electrical Equipment and Economy, 2024(10):196-199.

[8]刘云.煤电“三改联动”技术综述及讨论[J].洁净煤技术,2024,30(增刊1):82-90.LIU Yun. Overview and discussion of coal power[J]. Clean Coal Technology,2024,30(S1):82-90.

[9]郑琰炜,陈献,朱磊,等.南方火电厂“三改联动”技术分析研究[J].电气时代,2023(增刊2):75-76.ZHENG Yanwei,CHEN Xian,ZHU Lei,et al. Technical analysis and research on“three reform linkages” in southern thermal power plant[J]. Electric Age,2023(S2):75-76.

[10]刘志强,叶春,张源,等.煤电“三改联动”实施分析与措施建议[J].热力发电,2023,52(5):154-159.LIU Zhiqiang,YE Chun,ZHANG Yuan,et al. Analysis and suggestions on the implementation of“three-renovation” of coalfired power[J]. Thermal Power Generation,2023,52(5):154-159.

[11]国家发展改革委.国家发展改革委国家发展改革委国家能源局关于建立煤电容量电价机制的通知[EB/OL]https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202311/content_6914744.htm.[2023-11-08].

[12]苑曙光,张俊杰,杨城,等.容量电价机制下区域电煤交易价格合理区间测算研究[J].煤炭经济研究,2025,45(3):17-24.YUAN Shuguang,ZHANG Junjie,YANG Cheng,et al. Research on reasonable range calculation of regional power coal transaction price under capacity price mechanism[J]. Coal Economic Research,2025,45(3):17-24.

[13]王帅,陈济,郑宽.容量电价助力煤电企业利润修复[J].中国电力企业管理,2025(1):24-27.WANG Shuai,CHEN Ji,ZHENG Kuan. Capacity electricity price helps coal-fired power enterprises to repair profits[J]. China Power Enterprise Management,2025(1):24-27.

[14]吴梓凤,马睿智,江艺康,等.煤电容量电价机制下分省煤电经济性分析[J].煤炭经济研究,2024,44(9):27-36.WU Zifeng,MA Ruizhi,JIANG Yikang,et al. Economic analysis of coal power by province under the coal capacity tariff mechanism[J]. Coal Economic Research,2024,44(9):27-36.

[15]柯潘明.煤电机组在容量电价机制下经济运行模式分析[J].内蒙古煤炭经济,2024(17):178-180.KE Panming. Analysis on economic operation mode of coal-fired power units under capacity electricity price mechanism[J]. Inner Mongolia Coal Economy,2024(17):178-180.

[16]赵紫原.煤电容量电价如何重塑我国电价体系[J].大众用电,2024,39(1):5-7.ZHAO Ziyuan. How to reshape China’s electricity price system by coal power capacity price[J]. Popular Utilization of Electricity,2024, 39(1):5-7.

[17]卢奇秀.煤电容量电价机制将走向何方?[N].中国能源报,2024-02-05(9).LU Quxiu. Where will the coal-fired power capacity pricing mechanism go?[N]. Chian Energy News,2024-02-05(9).

[18]杨娟.建立煤电容量电价机制推动能源绿色低碳转型[J].价格理论与实践,2023(11):28-30.YANG Juan. Establishing the coal power capacity pricing mechanism to promote green and low-carbon energy transition[J].Price Theory&Practice, 2023(11):28-30.

[19]李嘉龙,陈雨果,刘思捷,等.考虑深度调峰的电力日前市场机制设计[J].电力系统自动化,2019,43(4):9-15+78.LI Jialong,CHEN Yuguo,LIU Sijie,et al. Mechanism design of day-ahead market considering deep peak regulation[J].Automation of Electric Power Systems,2019,43(4):9-15+78.

[20]张宝.煤电容量电价机制对煤电机组运行的现实影响[J].中国电力企业管理,2023(34):53-56.ZHANG Bao. Realistic influence of coal capacity and electricity price mechanism on the operation of coal-fired power units[J].China Power Enterprise Management, 2023(34):53-56.

[21]张松岩,苗世洪,尹斌鑫,等.考虑火电深度调峰的多类型储能经济性分析[J].电力建设,2022,43(1):132-142.ZHANG Songyan,MIAO Shihong,YIN Binxin,et al. Economic analysis of multi-type energy storages considering the deep peakregulation of thermal power units[J]. Electric Power Construction,2022,43(1):132-142.

[22]王树东,吕为智.深度调峰形势下燃煤机组的价值量化评估[J].动力工程学报,2020,40(9):701-706.WANG Shudong,LYU Weizhi. Quantitative valuation of coalfired units under deep peak regulation conditions[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering,2020,40(9):701-706.

[23]谭增强,王一坤,牛拥军,等.双碳目标下煤电深度调峰及调频技术研究进展[J].热能动力工程,2022,37(8):1-8.TAN Zengqiang,WANG Yikun,NIU Yongjun,et al. Research progress of deep peak regulation and frequency modulation technology for coal-fired power plant under double-carbon targets[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power,2022,37(8):1-8.

[24]高明非.燃煤深度调峰机组运行经济性分析[D].唐山:华北理工大学,2018.GAO Mingfei. Economic analysis of coal-fired unit in deep shaving operation[D]. Tangshan:North China University of Science and Technology,2018.

[25]钱谷峰.燃煤机组深度调峰技术的运用探讨[J].中国设备工程,2020,(18):177-178.QIAN Gufeng. Discussion on the application of deep peak shaving technology for coal-fired power unit[J]. China Plant Engineering,2020,(18):177-178.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19944/j.eptep.1674-8069.2026.04.004

中图分类号:TM621

引用信息:

[1]乔梁,徐振,柏源.超/亚临界机组深度调峰工况经济指标对比研究[J].电力科技与环保,2026,42(04):554-561.DOI:10.19944/j.eptep.1674-8069.2026.04.004.

基金信息:

国电环境保护研究院有限公司自立项目(HBHZ2025Y01)

发布时间:

2026-08-15

出版时间:

2026-08-15

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文